For years I’ve heard this refrain and I don’t buy it. Sure, the shaft is an important component of the club but its engine? People who say this demean the importance of clubhead design and, though I may be biased, the club head has gone through more technological advances in the past 10 years than graphite shafts. The differences between the models from each premium shaft manufacturer are a lot smaller than are the differences in manufacturers’ head designs.
The facts are, if you took ten identical heads and installed ten different premium shafts into them, the performance variance between them, being ball velocity, launch angle, spin rate and dispersion, would be much tighter than ten different head designs using one make and model shaft. I’m talking about the difference between shafts in the premium category…not a $10.00 low end shaft.
Clearly the shaft manufacturers are enjoying a renaissance of sorts. Any time they can charge upwards of $150.00 wholesale for a single shaft, times are good. Yet are they good for golfers? Certainly the quality and performance of shafts have never been so consistent, but has the cost of raw graphite risen so high to command over $200.00 per shaft? Is a $200.00 shaft four times better than a $50.00 shaft? For the answer, we need to take a history lesson, and unfortunately, I must take some blame for this.
By the late ‘90’s, it was common for equipment manufacturers to use inexpensive graphite shafts in their stock-line offerings to increase margins. Custom club builders were strong in their opinions that $10.00 was the ceiling, and that paying $300.00 for any OEM Driver was a rip-off. Obviously, the custom club building industry was interested in promoting their lucrative re-shafting services, but their arguments had some merit. Through 1998, no OEM put the name of their shaft manufacturer on their in-line offerings. For example at the time, TaylorMade’s Bubble Shaft was very popular, but the source of “who made it” was the topic of speculation (it was Fujikura). Everyone knew that the Tour Pros weren’t using stock shafts. Since they were getting these special, exotic shafts for free, there was a consensus that only wealthy, top amateurs could afford to have their Drivers built with Tour shafts and even the shaft manufacturers bought into this.
Although the custom club industry was fueling the grassroots movement to premium custom shaft options, they did not have access to Tour quality head designs. Sensing this growing movement against stock shafts and needing a follow-up to my original TriMetals, in 1999 we became the first OEM to offer a Tour shaft with original factory graphics on an in-line OEM product. The TriMetal Plus woods came standard with True Temper’s EI-70 shaft. A year later several OEM’S followed our lead and the genie was out of the bottle. If you didn’t offer Tour shafts, the most common question asked in shops was, “who makes your shafts?” The shift brought “celebrity” or cache to the shaft manufacturers, and with that, leverage. I had drawn open the curtain of anonymity and put them in the same spotlight as the club itself… and equal component to the head. As consumers were presented with more brightly colored Tour shafts available as in-line stock offerings, the demand for ever more exotic shafts grew. Paint jobs and wild graphics that exploded on the television screen provided instant product differentiation…and fodder for Monday morning conversations by the water cooler. Now shaft manufacturers had more incentive to experiment with costlier high modulus materials to improve performance.
online pharmacycialislevitrasomaviagra
Up until the past couple of years, I was sure all this was a benefit to golfers, but today I have concerns. I am a huge advocate of Tour Premium shafts, but when I see shafts selling for $300.00, $500.00 or even $1000.00 each, who’s fooling who? When I meet people and they ask what I do for a living, I often say, “I’m in the business of selling hope.” It usually gets a chuckle, but it’s true. Can anyone tell the difference between a $100.00 shaft and a $500.00 one? I don’t believe so.
It just seems that there is so much hype to this, to the point that shafts have become more of a fashion statement than a component that adds a quantifiable performance enhancement…and don’t think this is lost on the manufacturers. When you are standing with your foursome on the first tee, all the heads look the same, but you can instantly tell what shaft each member is using. If you don’t think shafts have become a fashion statement, then you missed the “semi-finalists’” segment of The Golf Channels Fore Inventors Only show. One inventor presented a product called “shaft skins”, which essentially was a cleverly designed shrink-wrap sock that when blow-dried, tightly wrapped itself onto your club’s non-descript shaft. Got a cool blue apparel ensemble? Blow on some matching blue “skins” to your set. Want to psych-out your playing partners with your bold Tiger Woods Sunday look, just peel off the Tuesday blues and bring out the red shafted arsenal.
Am I being sarcastic? Of course…but the point is “Buyer Beware.” So much of the shaft game is marketing. There are many great shaft options available to golfers of every skill level but buying a game has never been a wise move. Before you lay out $300.00 or more reshafting your driver on the illusive quest for The Holy Grail, take the time to test various shaft opinions in the head design you favor. Don’t be surprised if the $75.00 shaft performs as well as the $300.00 re-shaft option. Club head design is still paramount. Shapes, weight positioning, CG, MOI, characteristic of time, spin rates, ball velocity, sound and feel, are still determined by head design, not the shaft.
The “shaft is the engine” statement is a myth. A more appropriate analogy would be: Just as a Ferrari can’t get out of the garage without tires, a golf club can’t hit a ball without a shaft. Hey, I like that. How about, “the shaft is the Pirelli’s of the club?” Michelins?